<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat Pants June 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/</link>
	<description>Get Pantsed!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: seba</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6101</link>
		<dc:creator>seba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6101</guid>
		<description>thanks for the answers, guys, and i'm glad they're not looking cancellation straight in the eye just now. i agree that azzarello's storytelling in loveless and 100bullets is not everyone's cup of tea, because it is indeed challenging for the reader. sometimes you need to go back a few issues to understand what's going on. but i think that's what makes it rich and interesting, because as complex as his plots may be, they're never obscure.
does he have a website/blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the answers, guys, and i&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re not looking cancellation straight in the eye just now. i agree that azzarello&#8217;s storytelling in loveless and 100bullets is not everyone&#8217;s cup of tea, because it is indeed challenging for the reader. sometimes you need to go back a few issues to understand what&#8217;s going on. but i think that&#8217;s what makes it rich and interesting, because as complex as his plots may be, they&#8217;re never obscure.<br />
does he have a website/blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovid</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6100</guid>
		<description>I got the first two trades of Azzarello's Loveless and, well, loved it. I don't think his storytelling style does him any favours in the direct market, though, or even in trades come to think of it. He resolutely ignores conventional storytelling structures, at least he has done in Loveless. That means that a huge amount of trust is required from the reader that it's going to work out. IIRC, he once described his series as making up long novels, but they resemble modernist novels more than, say, those by Dickens which actually were written for serial publication. It's a risky move, but I certainly hope Vertigo has the patience to hold out for the end.

[quote comment="6090"]That's strange but cool at the same time. I couldn't come up with a cool username, so I used my real name. I did notice that there was another T. Martin when I browsing on the Hot Pant: The Spirit column. Since I know that I didn't post that message.[/quote]Yeah. That was me too - there was a period when my computer was going haywire and I was having difficulty posting under any name or working out what I had or hadn't successfully posted. It died a week or two later. I friggin hate computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the first two trades of Azzarello&#8217;s Loveless and, well, loved it. I don&#8217;t think his storytelling style does him any favours in the direct market, though, or even in trades come to think of it. He resolutely ignores conventional storytelling structures, at least he has done in Loveless. That means that a huge amount of trust is required from the reader that it&#8217;s going to work out. IIRC, he once described his series as making up long novels, but they resemble modernist novels more than, say, those by Dickens which actually were written for serial publication. It&#8217;s a risky move, but I certainly hope Vertigo has the patience to hold out for the end.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6090"><p>
That&#8217;s strange but cool at the same time. I couldn&#8217;t come up with a cool username, so I used my real name. I did notice that there was another T. Martin when I browsing on the Hot Pant: The Spirit column. Since I know that I didn&#8217;t post that message.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah. That was me too - there was a period when my computer was going haywire and I was having difficulty posting under any name or working out what I had or hadn&#8217;t successfully posted. It died a week or two later. I friggin hate computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harries</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6099</link>
		<dc:creator>Harries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6099</guid>
		<description>Actually ‘Loveless’ already has two trades out, with another recently solicited.

I know Azzerello’s always had a short-ish run in mind for the book (around forty issues, I believe) and I suspect this coupled with Azzerello’s favored son status at DC/Vertigo will at least help to secure the books future.

(Although I note that the Doug Rushkoff book was recently cancelled.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually ‘Loveless’ already has two trades out, with another recently solicited.</p>
<p>I know Azzerello’s always had a short-ish run in mind for the book (around forty issues, I believe) and I suspect this coupled with Azzerello’s favored son status at DC/Vertigo will at least help to secure the books future.</p>
<p>(Although I note that the Doug Rushkoff book was recently cancelled.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cove West</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>Cove West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>Yeah, single-issue sales of FIRST CLASS stomp all over the MA line, but I was thinking more of digest sales.  We'd have no way of knowing now, but I'd like to have seen if going digest rather than HC for the collection would have had comparable sales to the MA singles vs. digest sales jump.  And I have a sneaking suspicion FIRST CLASS sells so much better because of the X, not because it's non-MA.

Yeah, Ronan was the example I was thinking of, too.  The story itself was the most pointless of the minis, but it was arguably the most needed, since Ronan was the "emptiest" character of the four and required some measure of set-up outside of ANNI-proper for his pivotal role to work.  That, and it was the only view we got of the final battleground of Kree space before the Wave hit.  I still wish Furman had used Peter Quill somewhere; Quill's sudden appearance as the sixth protagonist in ANNI #1 might've seemed natural had he showed up in one of the minis (and RONAN was the best fit).

And in my opinion, CONQUEST is worse.  Not dramatically, and by no stretch un-improvable (English? Huh?), but I'm not feeling WRAITH and QUASAR like I did NOVA and SURFER.  If the original was an A, the sequel gets a B thus far.  But all these guys have done it successfully once before, so I have faith that they know what they're doing.  Not tree-worshipping-cosmic-lesbian faith, but it has its strengths...

Vertigo 60 is my ideal too, just not in FABLES case.  Unlike SANDMAN, Y, or PREACHER, FABLES has too big a developed cast to be contained under 100 issues, IMO.  Sure, he could have ended things just fine in #50, but the main characters have grown beyond just Snow, Bigby, Blue, and Jack at this point.  Not that I want to see FABLES #294 if the 'inghams don't have it in them, but I also don't want to see them end too soon, either.  FABLES is, and always was, more than about fighting the Adversary, so I don't want that plot in particular to dictate the endpoint.

Holy crap!  Baby Stick!  It's like the X-Babies, only ass-kickier!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, single-issue sales of FIRST CLASS stomp all over the MA line, but I was thinking more of digest sales.  We&#8217;d have no way of knowing now, but I&#8217;d like to have seen if going digest rather than HC for the collection would have had comparable sales to the MA singles vs. digest sales jump.  And I have a sneaking suspicion FIRST CLASS sells so much better because of the X, not because it&#8217;s non-MA.</p>
<p>Yeah, Ronan was the example I was thinking of, too.  The story itself was the most pointless of the minis, but it was arguably the most needed, since Ronan was the &#8220;emptiest&#8221; character of the four and required some measure of set-up outside of ANNI-proper for his pivotal role to work.  That, and it was the only view we got of the final battleground of Kree space before the Wave hit.  I still wish Furman had used Peter Quill somewhere; Quill&#8217;s sudden appearance as the sixth protagonist in ANNI #1 might&#8217;ve seemed natural had he showed up in one of the minis (and RONAN was the best fit).</p>
<p>And in my opinion, CONQUEST is worse.  Not dramatically, and by no stretch un-improvable (English? Huh?), but I&#8217;m not feeling WRAITH and QUASAR like I did NOVA and SURFER.  If the original was an A, the sequel gets a B thus far.  But all these guys have done it successfully once before, so I have faith that they know what they&#8217;re doing.  Not tree-worshipping-cosmic-lesbian faith, but it has its strengths&#8230;</p>
<p>Vertigo 60 is my ideal too, just not in FABLES case.  Unlike SANDMAN, Y, or PREACHER, FABLES has too big a developed cast to be contained under 100 issues, IMO.  Sure, he could have ended things just fine in #50, but the main characters have grown beyond just Snow, Bigby, Blue, and Jack at this point.  Not that I want to see FABLES #294 if the &#8216;inghams don&#8217;t have it in them, but I also don&#8217;t want to see them end too soon, either.  FABLES is, and always was, more than about fighting the Adversary, so I don&#8217;t want that plot in particular to dictate the endpoint.</p>
<p>Holy crap!  Baby Stick!  It&#8217;s like the X-Babies, only ass-kickier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Lander</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6095</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Lander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6095</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6060"]Every now and then, I get sort of down on comics.  "What's the use?" I ask myself.  "It's all just crap anymore anyway."  And then I see big, shiny hardcover shrines to awesomeness like these and I gasp, as though thought balloons were lodged in my esophagus.  "Puny human!" the thought balloon muses in booming Hulk lettering, "Comics kick your ass!"  Yes they do, angry green schizoprenic figment of my dementia.  Yes they do.[/quote]

Cove, your posts always make me smile. Stuff like this is why.

[quote comment="6060"]Brilliant little book that finally makes the Original Five exciting (only took forty years!).  I do wonder why it isn't a Marvel Adventures title, though.  As Randy said, the continuity doesn't fit well enough to be a retro series (though I really wish it did, as it would go a long way to re-energizing the adult versions), so why is Marvel apparently trying to trick people into thinking it is?[/quote]

Not sure why it wasn't branded as Marvel Adventures, but it's probably a good thing it wasn't. The Marvel Adventures line, while good to great, doesn't always get the sales it deserves in the direct market because it's considered "kiddie" comics and doesn't sell so well to the audience who want the "real" version of the characters. X-Men First Class does about twice the numbers it would do without the Marvel Adventures tag on it. A shame, because for me, the brand stands for all-ages quality, but it's probably something they should shy away from in future in terms of the direct market. Compare Jeff Parker's Marvel Adventures Avengers and X-Men First Class in terms of sales, and First Class handily wins, even though (much as I love First Class) Avengers is a better book.

[quote comment="6060"]Rereading ANNIHILATION in collection, it strikes me how much more explosive the main series was than the minis.  Aside from SUPER-SKRULL, the rest were (comparatively) subdued character pieces.  And then Book 3 hits and it practically burns with scope and drama.  Yet you can look back and see all the pieces falling into place in the minis.  A near-perfect way to structure an event, pulled off with even better execution.  Finally, a crossover that lived up to itself.  And good on Marvel for recognizing this and bringing the band back together (with a new drummer!) for CONQUEST.[/quote]

Yep. I had the same reaction in reading the hardcovers. Even Ronan, which at the time I found near-unreadable, puts important elements into place and reads stronger when you're reading it all as one big story. Impressive structure, and a solid event from beginning to end. And CONQUEST is actually better, in my opinion.

[quote comment="6060"]Randy, while I agree that Sons of Empire pales in comparison to Homelands, Arabian Nights (and Days), and Wolves, it still lives up to the FABLES Stamp of Quality.  And a part of me is glad to see Willingham back off the ante-upping of the War a bit.  I'm afraid that he'll hit that epic groove too much, the book will become too driven by the plot, and he'll run into the "endgame" phase too soon.[/quote]

I'm the guy who wants every Vertigo series to end at issue 60, at the most, so that's where I come from. Every time Willingham mentions that he has no plans to end Fables, I get nervous, because I'd rather see a good, strong story that begins and ends than one that eventually I grow to hate, possibly tainting all that went before. (See also: Powers, and to a lesser degree Strangers in Paradise). I suspect if the 100 Bullets timeline had been compressed a little, to the standard Vertigo 60 instead of the 100 mark, I might actually have read it all the way to the end, and I'm not sure now that I'm going to.

[quote comment="6060"]And if anyone reading this hasn't read Jeff Parker's MARVEL ADVENTURES: THE AVENGERS, go steal a copy from a starving, retarded, one-limbed blind baby.[/quote]

You could also buy it at your local store. But Cove's method will produce superior comics. And is relatively easy, as long as you don't hit that 1 in 100 baby that is secretly a blind midget kung fu master trying to teach would-be thieves a lesson.

[quote comment="6088"]i've noticed that 100 bullets has come to a halt in publication, at least, and i hope, for just a few months, as has Ex-Machina. anybody knows what is going on with these titles, as well as if Loveless is due to be cancelled soon? (as you can see I'm a big fan of azzarello and Vaughan.)[/quote]

I don't know anything in particular, but as far as I know, both Ex Machina and 100 Bullets aren't in any danger of going away. 100 Bullets was cancelled and resolicited, next issue is due out in September. Ex Machina I can't remember, but I believe there's an issue due in August or September. Whether it's busy artists and writers or the workings of evil monkeys, I don't know, but fret not, both series are safe.

As for Loveless? Also safe, at least for now. But the sales are fairly low, and I don't know if it's going to make it long-haul or not. I could say the same for one of my favorites, American Virgin, but the fact that Vertigo has given it two trades thus far with another one solicited leads me to believe it's going to survive for a while. I think Loveless, with one trade under its belt and another to come, is probably in the same "relatively safe, but don't fall too in love with it" boat.

This has been barely informed speculation theater from Randy Lander. Thank you... and good night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6060"><p>
Every now and then, I get sort of down on comics.  &#8220;What&#8217;s the use?&#8221; I ask myself.  &#8220;It&#8217;s all just crap anymore anyway.&#8221;  And then I see big, shiny hardcover shrines to awesomeness like these and I gasp, as though thought balloons were lodged in my esophagus.  &#8220;Puny human!&#8221; the thought balloon muses in booming Hulk lettering, &#8220;Comics kick your ass!&#8221;  Yes they do, angry green schizoprenic figment of my dementia.  Yes they do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cove, your posts always make me smile. Stuff like this is why.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6060"><p>
Brilliant little book that finally makes the Original Five exciting (only took forty years!).  I do wonder why it isn&#8217;t a Marvel Adventures title, though.  As Randy said, the continuity doesn&#8217;t fit well enough to be a retro series (though I really wish it did, as it would go a long way to re-energizing the adult versions), so why is Marvel apparently trying to trick people into thinking it is?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Not sure why it wasn&#8217;t branded as Marvel Adventures, but it&#8217;s probably a good thing it wasn&#8217;t. The Marvel Adventures line, while good to great, doesn&#8217;t always get the sales it deserves in the direct market because it&#8217;s considered &#8220;kiddie&#8221; comics and doesn&#8217;t sell so well to the audience who want the &#8220;real&#8221; version of the characters. X-Men First Class does about twice the numbers it would do without the Marvel Adventures tag on it. A shame, because for me, the brand stands for all-ages quality, but it&#8217;s probably something they should shy away from in future in terms of the direct market. Compare Jeff Parker&#8217;s Marvel Adventures Avengers and X-Men First Class in terms of sales, and First Class handily wins, even though (much as I love First Class) Avengers is a better book.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6060"><p>
Rereading ANNIHILATION in collection, it strikes me how much more explosive the main series was than the minis.  Aside from SUPER-SKRULL, the rest were (comparatively) subdued character pieces.  And then Book 3 hits and it practically burns with scope and drama.  Yet you can look back and see all the pieces falling into place in the minis.  A near-perfect way to structure an event, pulled off with even better execution.  Finally, a crossover that lived up to itself.  And good on Marvel for recognizing this and bringing the band back together (with a new drummer!) for CONQUEST.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep. I had the same reaction in reading the hardcovers. Even Ronan, which at the time I found near-unreadable, puts important elements into place and reads stronger when you&#8217;re reading it all as one big story. Impressive structure, and a solid event from beginning to end. And CONQUEST is actually better, in my opinion.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6060"><p>
Randy, while I agree that Sons of Empire pales in comparison to Homelands, Arabian Nights (and Days), and Wolves, it still lives up to the FABLES Stamp of Quality.  And a part of me is glad to see Willingham back off the ante-upping of the War a bit.  I&#8217;m afraid that he&#8217;ll hit that epic groove too much, the book will become too driven by the plot, and he&#8217;ll run into the &#8220;endgame&#8221; phase too soon.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m the guy who wants every Vertigo series to end at issue 60, at the most, so that&#8217;s where I come from. Every time Willingham mentions that he has no plans to end Fables, I get nervous, because I&#8217;d rather see a good, strong story that begins and ends than one that eventually I grow to hate, possibly tainting all that went before. (See also: Powers, and to a lesser degree Strangers in Paradise). I suspect if the 100 Bullets timeline had been compressed a little, to the standard Vertigo 60 instead of the 100 mark, I might actually have read it all the way to the end, and I&#8217;m not sure now that I&#8217;m going to.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6060"><p>
And if anyone reading this hasn&#8217;t read Jeff Parker&#8217;s MARVEL ADVENTURES: THE AVENGERS, go steal a copy from a starving, retarded, one-limbed blind baby.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You could also buy it at your local store. But Cove&#8217;s method will produce superior comics. And is relatively easy, as long as you don&#8217;t hit that 1 in 100 baby that is secretly a blind midget kung fu master trying to teach would-be thieves a lesson.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6088"><p>
i&#8217;ve noticed that 100 bullets has come to a halt in publication, at least, and i hope, for just a few months, as has Ex-Machina. anybody knows what is going on with these titles, as well as if Loveless is due to be cancelled soon? (as you can see I&#8217;m a big fan of azzarello and Vaughan.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anything in particular, but as far as I know, both Ex Machina and 100 Bullets aren&#8217;t in any danger of going away. 100 Bullets was cancelled and resolicited, next issue is due out in September. Ex Machina I can&#8217;t remember, but I believe there&#8217;s an issue due in August or September. Whether it&#8217;s busy artists and writers or the workings of evil monkeys, I don&#8217;t know, but fret not, both series are safe.</p>
<p>As for Loveless? Also safe, at least for now. But the sales are fairly low, and I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s going to make it long-haul or not. I could say the same for one of my favorites, American Virgin, but the fact that Vertigo has given it two trades thus far with another one solicited leads me to believe it&#8217;s going to survive for a while. I think Loveless, with one trade under its belt and another to come, is probably in the same &#8220;relatively safe, but don&#8217;t fall too in love with it&#8221; boat.</p>
<p>This has been barely informed speculation theater from Randy Lander. Thank you&#8230; and good night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Lander</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6094</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Lander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6094</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6091"]Flight vol. 4 is out this week. Is it any good? How does it  compared to the previous volumes?[/quote][/quote]

I have only read the first story, so I can't say for sure, but I will say that a flip-through confirms the art is as good as the other volumes.

I'm sure to have more to say in the Fat Pants for August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6091"><p>
Flight vol. 4 is out this week. Is it any good? How does it  compared to the previous volumes?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I have only read the first story, so I can&#8217;t say for sure, but I will say that a flip-through confirms the art is as good as the other volumes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure to have more to say in the Fat Pants for August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Martin</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6091</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6091</guid>
		<description>Flight vol. 4 is out this week. Is it any good? How does it  compared to the previous volumes?[/quote]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flight vol. 4 is out this week. Is it any good? How does it  compared to the previous volumes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Martin</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6090</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6090</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6084"][quote comment="6076"]
You're a T. Martin too? Cool! I review under that name at Comixfan. :)[/quote]
That's strange but cool at the same time. I couldn't come up with a cool username, so I used my real name. I did notice that there was another T. Martin when I browsing on the Hot Pant: The Spirit column. Since I know that I didn't post that message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote comment="6084">
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6076">
<p>You&#8217;re a T. Martin too? Cool! I review under that name at Comixfan. <img src='http://comicpants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s strange but cool at the same time. I couldn&#8217;t come up with a cool username, so I used my real name. I did notice that there was another T. Martin when I browsing on the Hot Pant: The Spirit column. Since I know that I didn&#8217;t post that message.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seba</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6088</link>
		<dc:creator>seba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6088</guid>
		<description>hi everyone. i'd like to ask a question which has nothing to do with the topics in this forum, but i don't know who or where to ask, so please bear with me.
i've noticed that 100 bullets has come to a halt in publication, at least, and i hope, for just a few months, as has Ex-Machina.
anybody knows what is going on with these titles, as well as if Loveless is due to be cancelled soon? (as you can see I'm a big fan of azzarello and Vaughan.)

thank you!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi everyone. i&#8217;d like to ask a question which has nothing to do with the topics in this forum, but i don&#8217;t know who or where to ask, so please bear with me.<br />
i&#8217;ve noticed that 100 bullets has come to a halt in publication, at least, and i hope, for just a few months, as has Ex-Machina.<br />
anybody knows what is going on with these titles, as well as if Loveless is due to be cancelled soon? (as you can see I&#8217;m a big fan of azzarello and Vaughan.)</p>
<p>thank you!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovid</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6084</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6076"]I'm with Ovid, like both Brave &#38; the Bold and Blue Beetle. Those two titles should get more mentioned here. I hope more titles like those are published by DC, since I'm also not a big fan of a darken DC Universe.[/quote]
You're a T. Martin too? Cool! I review under that name at Comixfan. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6076"><p>
I&#8217;m with Ovid, like both Brave &amp; the Bold and Blue Beetle. Those two titles should get more mentioned here. I hope more titles like those are published by DC, since I&#8217;m also not a big fan of a darken DC Universe.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re a T. Martin too? Cool! I review under that name at Comixfan. <img src='http://comicpants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Martin</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6076</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6076</guid>
		<description>I'm with Ovid, like both Brave &#38; the Bold and Blue Beetle. Those two titles should get more mentioned here. I hope more titles like those are published by DC, since I'm also not a big fan of a darken DC Universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Ovid, like both Brave &amp; the Bold and Blue Beetle. Those two titles should get more mentioned here. I hope more titles like those are published by DC, since I&#8217;m also not a big fan of a darken DC Universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrayPumpkin</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6066</link>
		<dc:creator>GrayPumpkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6066</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6065"]In fact, the one book that seems to have tried for a bit of a silver-agey vibe and failed is, surprisingly, Morrison's BATMAN.[/quote]
Yeah what's up with that I wonder? I'm a huge Morrison fan, All Star Superman, just sings with fun and coolness. But his Batman, while it's had its moments, just hasn't done it for me, very surprising indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6065"><p>
In fact, the one book that seems to have tried for a bit of a silver-agey vibe and failed is, surprisingly, Morrison&#8217;s BATMAN.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah what&#8217;s up with that I wonder? I&#8217;m a huge Morrison fan, All Star Superman, just sings with fun and coolness. But his Batman, while it&#8217;s had its moments, just hasn&#8217;t done it for me, very surprising indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovid</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6065</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6047"]the old school carefree/angsty/cheesy/melodramatic vibe is only bettered by ASS at the mo wouldn't you agree? or is there some similarly silver-age aping funny book?[/quote]
BRAVE &#38; THE BOLD is great, IMO. So's BLUE BEETLE (when Rogers is writing it) and Slott's soon-to-end SHE-HULK run.

I know Randy moans about the darkening of the Big Two universes, and I'm with him on that, but there are spots of light and unabashed comic joy out there.

In fact, the one book that seems to have tried for a bit of a silver-agey vibe and failed is, surprisingly, Morrison's BATMAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6047"><p>
the old school carefree/angsty/cheesy/melodramatic vibe is only bettered by ASS at the mo wouldn&#8217;t you agree? or is there some similarly silver-age aping funny book?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>BRAVE &amp; THE BOLD is great, IMO. So&#8217;s BLUE BEETLE (when Rogers is writing it) and Slott&#8217;s soon-to-end SHE-HULK run.</p>
<p>I know Randy moans about the darkening of the Big Two universes, and I&#8217;m with him on that, but there are spots of light and unabashed comic joy out there.</p>
<p>In fact, the one book that seems to have tried for a bit of a silver-agey vibe and failed is, surprisingly, Morrison&#8217;s BATMAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cove West</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6060</link>
		<dc:creator>Cove West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6060</guid>
		<description>Every now and then, I get sort of down on comics.  "What's the use?" I ask myself.  "It's all just crap anymore anyway."  And then I see big, shiny hardcover shrines to awesomeness like these and I gasp, as though thought balloons were lodged in my esophagus.  "Puny human!" the thought baloon muses in booming Hulk lettering, "Comics kick your ass!"  Yes they do, angry green schizoprenic figment of my dementia.  Yes they do.

Nick, just imagine a poor man's Joe Madureira with little storytelling sense and a hearty helping of Imageistic kewlisms: that's what Roger Cruz used to be.  He's grown so much as an artist and storyteller now that it's hard to imagine it's the same guy.  I think he's almost as integral to FIRST CLASS as Miyazawa to SMLMJ.  As for FIRST CLASS itself, it doesn't need any more kudos than you guys already gave it.  Brilliant little book that finally makes the Original Five exciting (only took forty years!).  I do wonder why it isn't a Marvel Adventures title, though.  As Randy said, the continuity doesn't fit well enough to be a retro series (though I really wish it did, as it would go a long way to re-energizing the adult versions), so why is Marvel apparently trying to trick people into thinking it is?

Rereading ANNIHILATION in collection, it strikes me how much more explosive the main series was than the minis.  Aside from SUPER-SKRULL, the rest were (comparatively) subdued character pieces.  And then Book 3 hits and it practically burns with scope and drama.  Yet you can look back and see all the pieces falling into place in the minis.  A near-perfect way to structure an event, pulled off with even better execution.  Finally, a crossover that lived up to itself.  And good on Marvel for recognizing this and bringing the band back together (with a new drummer!) for CONQUEST.  

Randy, while I agree that Sons of Empire pales in comparison to Homelands, Arabian Nights (and Days), and Wolves, it still lives up to the FABLES Stamp of Quality.  And a part of me is glad to see Willingham back off the ante-upping of the War a bit.  I'm afraid that he'll hit that epic groove too much, the book will become too driven by the plot, and he'll run into the "endgame" phase too soon.  I can see him going plot-heavy in the run up to #50, and even having a few issues of fallout afterwards, but the Sons arc and current Good Prince story feel a little culminate-y for my tastes at this stage.  I'd hate to see the series lose plot-steam in the 60s, because I think there's enough non-War material to keep it strong well into the 100s.  So I welcome the "fluffy" one-offs in SoE.  Especially Christmas, one of the best single issues I've ever read.

And if anyone reading this hasn't read Jeff Parker's MARVEL ADVENTURES: THE AVENGERS, go steal a copy from a starving, retarded, one-limbed blind baby.  Trust me, it's the right thing to do.  It's THE comic people will be in-joking about for years to come.  You DO want in on the joke, don't you?  Or do you just want to be some lame Karl?  SEE!?!  IT'S ALREADY STARTING!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, I get sort of down on comics.  &#8220;What&#8217;s the use?&#8221; I ask myself.  &#8220;It&#8217;s all just crap anymore anyway.&#8221;  And then I see big, shiny hardcover shrines to awesomeness like these and I gasp, as though thought balloons were lodged in my esophagus.  &#8220;Puny human!&#8221; the thought baloon muses in booming Hulk lettering, &#8220;Comics kick your ass!&#8221;  Yes they do, angry green schizoprenic figment of my dementia.  Yes they do.</p>
<p>Nick, just imagine a poor man&#8217;s Joe Madureira with little storytelling sense and a hearty helping of Imageistic kewlisms: that&#8217;s what Roger Cruz used to be.  He&#8217;s grown so much as an artist and storyteller now that it&#8217;s hard to imagine it&#8217;s the same guy.  I think he&#8217;s almost as integral to FIRST CLASS as Miyazawa to SMLMJ.  As for FIRST CLASS itself, it doesn&#8217;t need any more kudos than you guys already gave it.  Brilliant little book that finally makes the Original Five exciting (only took forty years!).  I do wonder why it isn&#8217;t a Marvel Adventures title, though.  As Randy said, the continuity doesn&#8217;t fit well enough to be a retro series (though I really wish it did, as it would go a long way to re-energizing the adult versions), so why is Marvel apparently trying to trick people into thinking it is?</p>
<p>Rereading ANNIHILATION in collection, it strikes me how much more explosive the main series was than the minis.  Aside from SUPER-SKRULL, the rest were (comparatively) subdued character pieces.  And then Book 3 hits and it practically burns with scope and drama.  Yet you can look back and see all the pieces falling into place in the minis.  A near-perfect way to structure an event, pulled off with even better execution.  Finally, a crossover that lived up to itself.  And good on Marvel for recognizing this and bringing the band back together (with a new drummer!) for CONQUEST.  </p>
<p>Randy, while I agree that Sons of Empire pales in comparison to Homelands, Arabian Nights (and Days), and Wolves, it still lives up to the FABLES Stamp of Quality.  And a part of me is glad to see Willingham back off the ante-upping of the War a bit.  I&#8217;m afraid that he&#8217;ll hit that epic groove too much, the book will become too driven by the plot, and he&#8217;ll run into the &#8220;endgame&#8221; phase too soon.  I can see him going plot-heavy in the run up to #50, and even having a few issues of fallout afterwards, but the Sons arc and current Good Prince story feel a little culminate-y for my tastes at this stage.  I&#8217;d hate to see the series lose plot-steam in the 60s, because I think there&#8217;s enough non-War material to keep it strong well into the 100s.  So I welcome the &#8220;fluffy&#8221; one-offs in SoE.  Especially Christmas, one of the best single issues I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
<p>And if anyone reading this hasn&#8217;t read Jeff Parker&#8217;s MARVEL ADVENTURES: THE AVENGERS, go steal a copy from a starving, retarded, one-limbed blind baby.  Trust me, it&#8217;s the right thing to do.  It&#8217;s THE comic people will be in-joking about for years to come.  You DO want in on the joke, don&#8217;t you?  Or do you just want to be some lame Karl?  SEE!?!  IT&#8217;S ALREADY STARTING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Lander</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Lander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6056</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="6047"]having already purchased each individual issue of the wonderfukl first class i have no intention of buying the hardcover also - but i must admit it makes me a little sad...yous guys didn't mention any extra features that it has - are there script pages, preliminary art, anything like that in there?[/quote]

About six pages' worth. Cover sketches from Djurdjevic, the fun recap pages from the issues (shrunk too small to be very readable, unfortunately), character designs and unused pinups from Cruz. If you have the original issues, you've got pretty much everything.

[quote comment="6047"]the old school carefree/angsty/cheesy/melodramatic vibe is only bettered by ASS at the mo wouldn't you agree? or is there some similarly silver-age aping funny book?[/quote]

If you're digging All Star Superman and X-Men First Class, I highly recommend checking out Godland from Image. I think odds are good you'll like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6047"><p>
having already purchased each individual issue of the wonderfukl first class i have no intention of buying the hardcover also - but i must admit it makes me a little sad&#8230;yous guys didn&#8217;t mention any extra features that it has - are there script pages, preliminary art, anything like that in there?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>About six pages&#8217; worth. Cover sketches from Djurdjevic, the fun recap pages from the issues (shrunk too small to be very readable, unfortunately), character designs and unused pinups from Cruz. If you have the original issues, you&#8217;ve got pretty much everything.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6047"><p>
the old school carefree/angsty/cheesy/melodramatic vibe is only bettered by ASS at the mo wouldn&#8217;t you agree? or is there some similarly silver-age aping funny book?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;re digging All Star Superman and X-Men First Class, I highly recommend checking out Godland from Image. I think odds are good you&#8217;ll like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NathanK</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6051</link>
		<dc:creator>NathanK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6051</guid>
		<description>I wasn't crazy about the art in the story about the Bigby family visiting the North Wind. However, the plot developments in that story, I thought, were just as significant as in the Sons of the Empire story. From a character development standpoint, the revelations about the North Wind and how Bigby feels about his kids were great. Also, I was curious about Bigby's statement about hiding your true nature until the appropriate time. I wonder what he meant by that? I think he was just sparring verbally with his father, but it might reveal something else as well about his true nature. Maybe I just really like Bigby.  Oh, and you had to appreciate the little Pinnochio/Gepetto story that was in there as well. Gepetto always, always seems to control his image as a benevolent old man. It was one of the few glimpses of the real man behind the mask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t crazy about the art in the story about the Bigby family visiting the North Wind. However, the plot developments in that story, I thought, were just as significant as in the Sons of the Empire story. From a character development standpoint, the revelations about the North Wind and how Bigby feels about his kids were great. Also, I was curious about Bigby&#8217;s statement about hiding your true nature until the appropriate time. I wonder what he meant by that? I think he was just sparring verbally with his father, but it might reveal something else as well about his true nature. Maybe I just really like Bigby.  Oh, and you had to appreciate the little Pinnochio/Gepetto story that was in there as well. Gepetto always, always seems to control his image as a benevolent old man. It was one of the few glimpses of the real man behind the mask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebrahim Aldosary</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebrahim Aldosary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6048</guid>
		<description>As much as I loved the Kirby hardcover, paper quality and all, I still believe it's overpriced. It would have softened the blow if it was at least oversized (not Absolute oversized, but Marvel oversized). And that's a shame, too, because Kirby's art deserves a bigger format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I loved the Kirby hardcover, paper quality and all, I still believe it&#8217;s overpriced. It would have softened the blow if it was at least oversized (not Absolute oversized, but Marvel oversized). And that&#8217;s a shame, too, because Kirby&#8217;s art deserves a bigger format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanboy d</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6047</link>
		<dc:creator>fanboy d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6047</guid>
		<description>having already purchased each individual issue of the wonderfukl first class i have no intention of buying the hardcover also - but i must admit it makes me a little sad...yous guys didn't mention any extra features that it has - are there script pages, preliminary art, anything like that in there?

i too had never heard of this cruz guy, i'll be on the lookout for the x-brows now! one of my fav things he does is give the characterss in the panel that aren't speaking realistic, humorous reactions to what is being said with their facial expressions alone. the old school carefree/angsty/cheesy/melodramatic vibe is only bettered by ASS at the mo wouldn't you agree? or is there some similarly silver-age aping funny book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>having already purchased each individual issue of the wonderfukl first class i have no intention of buying the hardcover also - but i must admit it makes me a little sad&#8230;yous guys didn&#8217;t mention any extra features that it has - are there script pages, preliminary art, anything like that in there?</p>
<p>i too had never heard of this cruz guy, i&#8217;ll be on the lookout for the x-brows now! one of my fav things he does is give the characterss in the panel that aren&#8217;t speaking realistic, humorous reactions to what is being said with their facial expressions alone. the old school carefree/angsty/cheesy/melodramatic vibe is only bettered by ASS at the mo wouldn&#8217;t you agree? or is there some similarly silver-age aping funny book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie S. Rich</title>
		<link>http://comicpants.com/2007/07/fat-pants-june-2007/#comment-6044</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie S. Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicpants.com/?p=1744#comment-6044</guid>
		<description>Funny that Mike Allred is the only reason I've ever read a &lt;i&gt;Fables&lt;/i&gt; story, with the Joelle Jones one-pager also in this collection being the second. Maybe his work didn't fit, but for this Allred fan, it's because I actually thought he drew better than the comic demanded. 

Thus is the subjective world of reading comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that Mike Allred is the only reason I&#8217;ve ever read a <i>Fables</i> story, with the Joelle Jones one-pager also in this collection being the second. Maybe his work didn&#8217;t fit, but for this Allred fan, it&#8217;s because I actually thought he drew better than the comic demanded. </p>
<p>Thus is the subjective world of reading comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
