Annihilation Conquest #1 of 6

Writers: Dan Abnett & Andy Lanning
Artist: Tom Raney
Company: Marvel Comics

anncon001_cvr.jpgEvery once in awhile, a book comes along that immediately catches our attention and has a quality about it that makes each of us want to sit down and write up a full review for it. That type of thing doesn’t happen often, so to make things a little easier, on us and you, we’re going to do something a little different from the norm and each chime in on what makes the first issue of the Annihilation Conquest event such a thing to behold. So, without further ado, we bid you a hearty welcome to the Round-Table review of Annihilation Conquest #1 Note: No spoilers for Annihilation: Conquest here, but there is a spoiler for Annihilation Conquest: Quasar #4.

Nick: I don’t know where the other guys want to chime in on first but for me, what stands out most about the story put forth in this title is the writing. Everything so far, from the three four issue mini-series to the issues of Nova that tied into Annihilation, to this first issue…They have all had some of the best writing that I’ve seen lately in comics. That seems like a bold statement, and it is, but it’s the god’s honest truth. The framework for the entire event has been so solid and tight, so entertaining, that it led to a statement that didn’t seem possible, which was that the original Annihilation event paled in comparison to this second installment. Again, not something that really seemed possible as sequels are rarely as good as their predecessors, but like Godfather 2, Annihilation Conquest surprises the heck out of you with great reveals and superb action.

conqust15.jpgRandy: Like Godfather 2, Annihilation Conquest also features a surprisingly large role by Al Pacino. OK, not really. But it does look like it’s going to follow in the footsteps of the original Annihilation by using characters built up in the lead-in miniseries as its protagonists, particularly Quasar and Wraith and the retinue to characters they each built up in their climactic final issues. Quasar is doing the bulk of heavy lifting in Annihilation Conquest #1, which seems fitting given her discovery of the “savior” who is supposed to help free Kree space from the techno-organic Phalanx. But as Nick says, it really does look like this could be better than the original Annihilation, which featured Nova becoming a badass, Galactus swinging some punches and Silver Surfer unleashing cosmic hell. It’s too early to really see whether Conquest will best the original, but it sure does look possible based on the amount of awesome packed into the pages of this first issue.

Nick: To whom do we attribute this feat? For me, while there are many talented writers involved, Dan Abnett and Andy Lanning deserve a nice chunk of the credit. They have knocked it clean out of the park, time and time again, capturing the space odyssey and action extravaganza genre like few people can.

conqust16.jpgRandy: Indeed, DnA (as they’re known in some circles) are the go-to guys for cosmic action these days. They’re building on the well-known foundation of work by guys like Jim Starlin, Steve Englehart and Marv Wolfman, among others, and taking it in new and exciting directions. These guys know that when it comes to cosmic adventure like Annihilation, you’ve got to think big, like a Negative Zone baddie teaming up with the resistance to put a smackdown on the Phalanx, and that a gigantic swarm of guys on both sides is required for the scale. But they also know that you can reach into the Marvel Universe for familiar touchstones, and with just a minor tweak, they can fit in nicely with this larger-than-life space adventure story. There are two big reveals this issue, an ally and a villain, and while we won’t give away either in this review, let me say that my reactions, in order were “Wow! That’s cool!” and “Holy Shit! That’s cool!” I suspect readers who know the Marvel Universe will have much the same reactions.

Dan: I know I did. I went into the book expecting it to be awesome, but by the time I was done I was so jazzed I couldn’t believe it. It isn’t just that the big reveals were there- it was that it made sense for them to be there. I totally bought it, and then wondered why the hell I hadn’t thought of them before. There used to be this big separation between ‘cosmic’ characters and regular Marvel characters, and only in books like Fantastic Four did they meet, but it doesn’t have to be that way, and DnA are showing that big time.

Randy: It should be said, though, that Annihilation Conquest, while “cleared” in continuity with some of the other books at Marvel (and revealing which ones would again be a spoiler), does stand on its own, another aspect to recommend. You could even come to this book cold, not having read the lead-in miniseries, and you’re getting a pretty good space action epic. All you need to know is that the Phalanx, a techno-organic entity akin to Star Trek’s Borg, have taken over the Kree Empire and now a bunch of heroes, anti-heroes and even outright villains are trying to stop them from finishing the conquest and expanding into the rest of the universe. There’s the setup, cue the action.

conqust20.jpgDan: And boy, does it have action. Beautifully rendered, by the way, by Tom Raney and Scott Hanna. That was another thing that made me so happy with this issue- it just looks so damn good. There’s a depth and emotion to it that makes what’s happening seem that much more meaningful. The splash pages look amazing, but what really impressed me were actually a few of the smaller panels. There’s one of the face of a Phalanx-infested little Kree girl that almost made me cry, for example. That credit should rightfully be shared with colorist Frank D’Armata, whose subdued but vibrant palette brings the linework fully to life.

Nick: I’m in complete agreement on the art. When the Annihilation Conquest Prequel first came out, sporting snazzy art by the wonderful Mike Perkins, I thought to myself that this was the guy to do the main series. Perkins’ art was everything that one could hope for, as it nailed the intense action, the array of alien races, and the massive worlds that you need with a style that made all of it pop. Then, out of nowhere, I heard the name Tom Raney mentioned and I was a little bummed. Yup, you heard me correctly, I was bummed. But that feeling didn’t stick around for long. Raney, previous to this, had been doing some solid work on Ultimate X-Men and before that on The Outsiders but with Conquest, there’s a significant improvement and it’s easily some of his best stuff. His renditions of the Phalanx are complex to the max but also capture the creep factor of them as well. Of course, like Dan said, it really is a team effort. Both Scott Hanna and Frank D’Armata, whose color work is always nice to look at, deserve a nice round of applause too because man, does this book look freakin’ gorgeous.

conqust21.jpgRandy: I’ll dissent a bit from the group and say that I honestly prefer Raney inked by someone with a different style from Scott Hanna, who has a somewhat cross-hatched style that makes the book look closer to Jim Lee or David Finch, and that’s a harsher quality than I usually like in Raney’s work. That said, there’s no denying that the book looks great, and I love the costume redesign for Adam Warlock, not to mention a great classic shot of (spoiler number one) and a nice Annihilation-tinged look for (spoiler number two). Also, Raney really brings the same level of scale that DnA have, doing an especially good job crowding the pages with tons of Phalanx troops and strongly presenting the notion of an overwhelming enemy with his visuals.

Randy: While Annihilation: Conquest does have its twists and turns, I don’t want to oversell… I won’t say this is a “change your life” type of comic. It’s fairly nuts and bolts in its approach, and the focus is definitely on action and space opera rather than grander notions of any kind. But if you’re looking for a solid thrill ride in the sci-fi vein, Annihilation: Conquest should fit the bill nicely.

Dan: True enough. This isn’t the new Watchmen, but then, it isn’t pretending to be. It does what it tries to do very well, and that’s exactly what I look for in a comic. Hell, in any bit of entertainment.

Nick: So to conclude…Fast paced, immensely entertaining story? Check. Detailed and impressive art? Check. Massive amounts of action and a few actually surprising twists and turns? Yet another check. A book that you should more than likely pick up? Do I even need to answer that one?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Categories: Dan Grendell, Marvel Comics, Nick Budd, Randy Lander, Reviews | 7 comments for now

7 Responses to “Annihilation Conquest #1 of 6”

  1. Martin #

    I found out from a friend who the big villain was a few days ago (he showed me a scan of the last page). I’m not going to spoil it here, of course, but DAMN I’m glad it’s him/her. Good of the Annihilation writers to rescue him/her from misuse for a much better, more in-character use that - like Annihilus - serves to level that villain up in a way that makes him/her more interesting.

    (man, I sure jumped through hoops there just so I wouldn’t give away the gender :) )

    03 Nov 2007 at 2:45 am

    Quote
  2. Dan Coyle #

    Scott Hanna, cross-hatching? REALLY? I think you’re confusing D’Armata’s colors, which makes every comic look like a David Finch comic, with Hanna’s inks.

    03 Nov 2007 at 5:02 pm

    Quote
  3. Randy Lander #

    (man, I sure jumped through hoops there just so I wouldn’t give away the gender :) )

    Which I definitely appreciate. I think the guys spoiling it all over the Internet are displaying what I like to call EDB (Extreme Douchebag Behavior) (TM). :)

    I’m completely in agreement with you on the character and usage, btw.

    Scott Hanna, cross-hatching? REALLY? I think you’re confusing D’Armata’s colors, which makes every comic look like a David Finch comic, with Hanna’s inks.

    Nah, I’ve actually liked D’Armata’s colors quite a bit in other places, including the Crossgen books he worked on. Hanna’s got an inking style that is perfect for some guys, he is no doubt a talented inker, but it’s not the style I prefer for a guy like Raney.

    03 Nov 2007 at 7:53 pm

    Quote
  4. Brezhnev High #

    I found out from a friend who the big villain was a few days ago (he showed me a scan of the last page). I’m not going to spoil it here, of course, but DAMN I’m glad it’s him/her.

    It would so incredibly awesome if the big villian is Warlock from the New Mutants. I can see it now: “Self-friend Drax, destroy the interlopers.” Maybe even throw in Cypher and Bird Boy for good measure.

    Great to see Tom Raney doing the mini. As much as I liked his run on the Outsiders, for some reason his art just seems more suited for the space opera/widescreen style stories. I’d love to see him take over Thor whenever Olivier Coipel falls behind. I also have a soft spot for his run on Stormwatch - great stuff on the “Change or Die” storyline. (BTW has anyone read the comments Warren Ellis made on Podcasters. What an incredible asshole. I’m a little late in the game on this one, and you may have addressed this, but I cannot support a writer who compares podcasters to redneck meth-heads.)

    One last thing: Are there better creators doing the kick ass space saga storyline than DnA right now? Their Legion run was the best I’ve read (admittedly I’ve only been reading Legion since Zero Hour), their Nova run is great and now this. I wonder if Countdown would have been any better if these guys were the head writers instead of Paul Dini.

    04 Nov 2007 at 8:07 am

    Quote
  5. Randy Lander #

    Great to see Tom Raney doing the mini. As much as I liked his run on the Outsiders, for some reason his art just seems more suited for the space opera/widescreen style stories. I’d love to see him take over Thor whenever Olivier Coipel falls behind.

    That might be now. :) Actually, it could just as easily be JMS who has fallen behind. But Thor #4 is definitely late. Shame, because the relaunch is gathering steam, it’d suck to see lateness ruin that.

    I also have a soft spot for his run on Stormwatch - great stuff on the “Change or Die” storyline.

    Ditto. That’s where I first remember seeing Tom Raney’s work, and I loved it. I also like Warren Ellis’s Stormwatch better than Authority, to be honest.

    (BTW has anyone read the comments Warren Ellis made on Podcasters. What an incredible asshole. I’m a little late in the game on this one, and you may have addressed this, but I cannot support a writer who compares podcasters to redneck meth-heads.)

    Well, there’s two things to remember:

    1) Ellis’s online persona is just that, a persona, and he likes to say things that are unbelievably snarky, but often sound very clever and quotable.

    2) Ellis’s opinions on the comics industry are more or less completely irrelevant. He’s also writing novels, videogames, TV, and it’s clear that his passion is for writing, not comics. Nothing wrong with that, but Ellis’s take on the industry that he dabbles in is about as relevant as that of Harlan Ellison. His opinions on working as a writer at Marvel, DC, Image, etc.? Sure, relevant, because he’s done that. His opinions on the failures and (these never get mentioned, of course) successes of the direct market, comics fandom and comics journalism? About as important as those of any other fan on the Internet, albeit probably produced with a very readable, snappy prose that gives it a higher level of credibility than it has probably earned.

    Ellis is a very good writer, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t occasionally an asshole. He doesn’t sugar-coat his opinions, he just calls ‘em as he sees ‘em, which is fair, but sometimes it just comes off as being a snobbish dick.

    04 Nov 2007 at 12:11 pm

    Quote
  6. Brezhnev High #

    1) Ellis’s online persona is just that, a persona, and he likes to say things that are unbelievably snarky, but often sound very clever and quotable.

    I do see what you are saying about the personna. Hey, maybe it helps sell books. And normally I could care less about what he’s saying, but the podcasting comments just left a bad taste in my mouth. Like why insult the same people that are praising your books (for the most part) and exposing your work to a wider audience.

    Ellis is a very good writer, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t occasionally an asshole. He doesn’t sugar-coat his opinions, he just calls ‘em as he sees ‘em, which is fair, but sometimes it just comes off as being a snobbish dick.

    I agree, he is a good writer. Fell is a great series, Transmet is still up there with Sandman as the highlights of the Vertigo line (which is ironic since neither title started with Vertigo), and I generally enjoyed his “Counter-X” reboot (at least it was something different in the X-Universe).

    That might be now. :) Actually, it could just as easily be JMS who has fallen behind. But Thor #4 is definitely late. Shame, because the relaunch is gathering steam, it’d suck to see lateness ruin that.

    I’m cautiously optimistic with the Thor relaunch. Hoping for the Midnight Nation JMS as opposed to the spider-totem JMS.

    04 Nov 2007 at 1:36 pm

    Quote
  7. Dan Coyle #

    Here’s the thing about Ellis: no matter how bullying and judgmental he gets, he ALWAYS sells out in the end.

    04 Nov 2007 at 7:16 pm

    Quote

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> [spoiler]